Your data is apples to oranges. The data you show for the 2016 to 2020 period is enumeration for all immigrants in ALL forms.  The data we showed in our slide last night in Wisconsin was just Enumeration Beyond Entry (“EBE”) immigrants. The difference is Enumerations at Field https://x.com/pitdesi/status/pitdesi/status/1906817994090594418…

A recent debate over immigration data has sparked controversy after a social media post highlighted discrepancies in the statistics presented by different parties. The discussion centers around two distinct categories of immigrant enumeration: the broader category encompassing all immigrants from 2016 to 2020, and a more specific subset known as Enumeration Beyond Entry (EBE) immigrants.

The issue arose during a presentation in Wisconsin, where one group showcased data that included all immigrant types, while their opponents argued that the focus should have been strictly on EBE immigrants, which only accounts for a specific segment of the population. This difference in data interpretation has led to accusations of misleading statistics being used to influence public opinion on immigration policies.

Experts suggest that this debate underscores the complexities of immigration data and the need for clarity in how statistics are reported and interpreted. As discussions continue, the importance of accurate data in shaping immigration policy remains a pivotal topic in the ongoing national conversation.

This tweet is brought to you from:
https://x.com/doge